Spiritual Evidence Map
Reality & Time

Growing Block Universe

Spiritual Evidence Map/Last updated May 10, 2026/Claims v1.0.0-provisional/Sources v1.0.0/Scores provisional
Reality & Time·InvestigationSources verified

Does the past exist while the future does not — yet?

The past is real and growing. The future is not yet. A compromise that preserves becoming.

01THE THEORY

The proposition, plainly stated

A theoretical proposition with empirical implications. Here's what it actually says.

The growing block view is a compromise between presentism and the block universe: the past is real and fixed, the present is the leading edge, and the future does not yet exist. Reality literally accumulates as new moments come into being. C.D. Broad and Michael Tooley are the main defenders; the position attempts to preserve the felt 'flow' of time while keeping the past fully real.

02THE CASE FOR

The strongest arguments in favour

Before examining the objections — here are the reasons thoughtful people take this seriously, regardless of where it ultimately lands.

  1. 01Preserves the asymmetry of past and future.
  2. 02Defended in detail by Michael Tooley and others.
  3. 03Captures something of common-sense temporal experience.
03THE CASE AGAINST

The strongest objections

Now the other side. These are the most compelling reasons to remain skeptical.

  1. 01Inherits relativity-of-simultaneity problems.
  2. 02Defining the 'edge' of becoming is technically difficult.
  3. 03Minority position among philosophers of physics.
04Bottom line

Where this stands

Having seen the best case on both sides, here is our overall read.

Plausible but speculative

An attempt to keep the becoming of time real while accepting the past as fixed. Defended by Tooley and others. Has some of the same problems with relativity as presentism.

Compromise position between block and presentism. Elegant in some ways, awkward with relativity.
What this evidence supports

That intermediate positions between strict block and strict presentism are coherent.

What this evidence does NOT prove

That the future is genuinely open or unreal.

05Scores

Phenomenon vs interpretation

The signature distinction. We score the underlying observation separately from the metaphysical framework usually attached to it.

Phenomenon vs Interpretation
Provisional
PhenomenonN/A

Evidence the reported observation is real.

Interpretation4/10

Evidence the bigger explanation is correct.

Evidence4/10

Headline score (defaults to phenomenon score for phenomena).

Speculation6/10

Distance between data and conclusion.

06In practice

What a thoughtful person might do with this

Hold time models loosely; the picture is unsettled at the foundations.

07Risk warning

How belief in this can go wrong

Sometimes used to support strong claims about open future that the model doesn't actually justify.

08Audit trail

Audit trail

The 11 internal criteria informing the headline scores. They're not arithmetically averaged — they're the audit trail.

09Related

Related claims

10Sources

Sources & Further Reading

Our goal is to link to original studies, academic sources, and serious critiques wherever possible. Scores are provisional until sources are verified.

Primary sources

Ned Markosian · 2020 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

Explains what each of the time-models actually claims before any physics is brought in.

Being and Becoming in Modern Physics

Steven Savitt · 2021 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

Direct treatment of the physics-of-time question — exactly the territory the block-universe claim lives in, without reducing the debate to a slogan.

Further reading

Being and Becoming in Modern Physics

Steven Savitt · 2021 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

The standard reference for the relativity-based case for a block universe and a useful counterweight to overly simple 'physics proves fate' claims.