Is past life regression therapy ethical?
Gabriel Andrade · 2017 · Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 10, 11
This source is used as challenges evidence across 1 linked claim and 3 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.
Summary
Ethics paper arguing that past-life regression lacks evidence-based support and risks implanting false memories.
How this source is used on the map
Directly relevant to soul-groups claims because that literature usually depends on hypnotic regression rather than spontaneous child-memory cases.
Citation record
- Authors
- Gabriel Andrade
- Year
- 2017
- Publication
- Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 10, 11
- Source type
- Journal article
- Map role
- challenges
- Credibility level
- primary
- Citation status
- Verified
- DOI
- Not recorded
- PubMed
- Recorded
- Not recorded
Editorial note
Most relevant as a caution about regression-derived claims; it does not evaluate the strongest spontaneous childhood past-life memory cases.
Linked claims
Related evidence hubs
Related sources
A high-trust methodology source for separating spontaneous child cases from regression-derived soul-group narratives.
Any claim about surviving death or being reincarnated presupposes a theory of personal identity. This entry sets the terms.
Closest direct reference for soul-group language, which is mostly popular or regression-derived. It supports concept mapping, not evidence that specific relationships are pre-assigned.
Direct reference for regression-derived claims and cryptomnesia explanations. It should be clearly distinguished from spontaneous child past-life memory cases, which have a different evidence profile.
Important as a genealogy source for the belief, not as verified evidence that soul groups exist.