Near-death experience
Wikipedia contributors · 2024 · Wikipedia
This source is used as context evidence across 1 linked claim and 3 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.
Summary
Overview of NDE phenomenology, the prospective hospital studies (van Lommel, Parnia AWARE), and the major neurophysiological hypotheses (anoxia, hypercapnia, REM intrusion, surge activity).
How this source is used on the map
General reference that lays out the main neurophysiological explanations alongside the survivalist interpretations.
Citation record
- Authors
- Wikipedia contributors
- Year
- 2024
- Publication
- Wikipedia
- Source type
- Secondary summary
- Map role
- context
- Credibility level
- secondary
- Citation status
- Verified
- DOI
- Not recorded
- PubMed
- Not recorded
- Not recorded
Linked claims
Related evidence hubs
Related research reports
A comparative guide to the strongest survival-adjacent evidence: NDEs, terminal lucidity, deathbed visions, past-life memories, mediumship, and after-death communication.
What NDE studies support, what they do not prove, and why the phenomenon remains one of the strongest spiritual-adjacent evidence clusters.
Related sources
Useful authority source for careful language: it separates recalled experiences of death from broad spiritual conclusions and lays out better future-study standards.
Major reference for the sceptical / cognitive-explanation side of psi-style claims.
One of the strongest brain-based counterweights in the NDE debate because it shows near-death neural activity can become organized rather than simply switching off.
A concise, mainstream skeptical anchor for NDE interpretation pages; especially useful paired with replies from NDE researchers.
Important physiological counter-evidence because it connects NDE reports to measurable blood-gas variables rather than relying on a purely speculative brain model.