Spiritual Evidence Map
Decision Lens · Play

Decision Lens. See your situation through the world’s biggest ideas.

Should you take the job, end the relationship, move countries, chase money, forgive someone, or take the risk? Decision Lens compares what different philosophies and spiritual models would say — then shows which advice is most worth trusting based on evidence, usefulness, and risk.

Add optional details below for a deeper analysis
Example questions
Reflection toolNot fortune-tellingEvidence-weightedSafety-first
Step 1 · Tell us about the decision

The more you say, the more useful the analysis.

Only the situation is required. Optional fields help each lens reason about your specific case — Decision Lens will try to fill them in for you from your description.

What decision or situation are you facing?

One direction you're considering.

The other direction (or stay where you are).

Family, freedom, growth, money, integrity, peace, impact… in your own words.

Money, time, relationships, regret, health, reputation.

If everything went well, what would the next chapter look like?

Optional
Use my belief profile

Save 3+ stances on the My Profile page to unlock this option.

Decision Lens is a reflection tool, not professional advice.

How Decision Lens decides what to weight

Evidence Map Weighting. Some lenses are more grounded than others.

Every lens gets to speak. The Best Overall Recommendation, however, privileges lenses with strong evidence, low harm risk, and high practical usefulness — and weights speculative ones lower. Spiritually meaningful lenses still contribute when clearly labeled.

  • Evidence-first / Practical lens
    Evidence-backed
    9
    1
    9
    2
    89%
  • Soul-growth lens
    Plausible but speculative
    3
    8
    6
    6
    41%
  • Stoic / Virtue ethics lens
    Philosophically serious
    6
    3
    8
    3
    70%
  • Utilitarian lens
    Philosophically serious
    6
    3
    8
    5
    67%
  • Existentialist / Authenticity lens
    Philosophically serious
    6
    4
    7
    4
    64%
  • Physicalist / Secular lens
    Evidence-backed
    8
    2
    8
    3
    78%
  • Karma / Moral consequence lens
    Weakly supported
    2
    9
    5
    7
    31%
  • Best-Fit Worldview lens
    Plausible but speculative
    5
    6
    6
    4
    54%

Weight formula: 0.40·evidence + 0.35·practical + 0.15·(10−harm) + 0.10·(10−speculation), normalised to a 0–1 scale. Editorial, not gospel — visible here so you can argue with it.

Boundaries · Read this once

What Decision Lens won’t do.

Reflection tool, not professional advice

Decision Lens is for thinking, not deciding. Treat it as a structured second opinion, not as a replacement for the people who actually know your situation.

Medical, legal, financial, mental-health

For these, please get qualified professional support. Decision Lens will not give a diagnosis, a legal opinion, or a financial recommendation, and you shouldn't take one from any AI.

Safety comes before every lens

If you're in danger, in crisis, or being harmed, no spiritual or philosophical lens overrides that. Reach out to professional or emergency support first.

Karma, destiny, and soul-contracts do not require suffering

Decision Lens will never tell you that you owe pain to a past life, that abuse is your lesson, or that staying in harm is what your soul came here for. It refuses on principle.

More under Play

Want to play with the lenses themselves?

Decision Lens runs your own situation through 8 worldview lenses. Thought Experiments goes the other way — pick a classic dilemma and watch each of the 9 lenses argue its case, with assumptions and risk warnings on the table.

Open Thought Experiments →Jump to the 12 dilemmas ↓