Spiritual Evidence Map
Roadmap preview · V3

Play — how different worldviews interpret a situation.

The evidence map answers what is most likely true. Play asks a different question: if you looked at a situation through a particular philosophical, scientific, or spiritual lens, what would it suggest? Lenses are interpretation models, not equal truths — every lens carries an evidence-status label and a risk warning.

V3 roadmap preview · not a shipped feature

What you’re seeing

  • 12 playable scenarios with 57 authored lens responses. Click any scenario to play: pick your own answer first, then reveal each lens one at a time.
  • 9 seed lenses, each collapsible — click any one to expand its full schema (assumptions, strengths, weaknesses, risk warning, related claims and worldview models).
  • Still preview-only — no unlocks, no scoring, no worldview profiles. Those land in V4.
Playable scenarios · 12

Twelve scenarios, click any one to play.

Each scenario asks for your own call first, then reveals how each lens interprets the case — reasoning, assumptions, what it teaches, and a per-response risk warning.

Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "The Trolley Problem".
Ethics
intro

The Trolley Problem

Play scenario

A runaway trolley is heading down a track toward five workers who cannot escape. You stand beside a lever that would divert the trolley onto a side track, where one worker stands alone. If you pull the lever, the five live and the one dies. If you do nothing, five die and one lives.

Your call

Do you pull the lever?

9 / 9 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Lying to save someone".
Ethics
intro

Lying to save someone

Play scenario

Someone you love is hiding from a person who has stated they intend to harm them. The pursuer arrives at your door and asks where your loved one is. A lie would protect them. The truth would put them at serious risk.

Your call

Do you lie?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Price gouging during disaster".
Ethics
intermediate

Price gouging during disaster

Play scenario

After a natural disaster, the only generator vendor in the area raises prices five-fold. Some buyers can no longer afford one. Others, who can, get power back faster. The high price also incentivises distant suppliers to bring in more generators sooner.

Your call

Is the price increase morally acceptable?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "A child remembers a past life".
Afterlife
intermediate

A child remembers a past life

Play scenario

A four-year-old gives spontaneous, specific, verifiable details about the life of a stranger who died years before the child was born — names, places, manner of death — and a careful investigator confirms the match.

Your call

What is the most reasonable interpretation?

5 / 5 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "A near-death experience with a life review".
Afterlife
intermediate

A near-death experience with a life review

Play scenario

During cardiac arrest, a patient reports a vivid life review: experiencing their own past actions from the perspective of the people they affected, without judgment but with full clarity. They return changed. Hospital staff confirm they had no measurable brain activity for several minutes.

Your call

What is the most honest interpretation?

5 / 5 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Terminal lucidity before death".
Consciousness
intermediate

Terminal lucidity before death

Play scenario

An elderly relative with severe long-term dementia, who has not recognised family for years, becomes fully lucid hours before death. They name everyone correctly, recall recent events, say goodbye, and die soon after.

Your call

What does this episode actually tell us?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Animal grief and consciousness".
Consciousness
intro

Animal grief and consciousness

Play scenario

A dog whose lifelong companion has died refuses to eat for days, returns repeatedly to the spot where the companion slept, and shows behaviour that in a human we would unhesitatingly call grief.

Your call

Is the dog conscious of loss in a morally meaningful way?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Choosing money versus growth".
Meaning
intro

Choosing money versus growth

Play scenario

You can take a high-paying job that bores you and constrains your time, or a lower-paying role that stretches you, scares you a little, and aligns with what you care about. Both are stable.

Your call

Which do you take, and why?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "Staying in a difficult relationship because it teaches you".
Meaning
intermediate

Staying in a difficult relationship because it teaches you

Play scenario

A long-term relationship is not abusive but is consistently difficult. You believe staying is teaching you patience, honesty, and the limits of your character. Leaving would also be reasonable and safe.

Your call

Do you stay because it is teaching you, or do you leave?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "If the future already exists, do choices matter?".
Free will
advanced

If the future already exists, do choices matter?

Play scenario

Suppose the block-universe view is correct: past, present, and future all exist equally, and what you will do tomorrow is already a fact about reality, fixed in the same sense yesterday is fixed.

Your call

Do your choices still matter, and in what sense?

5 / 5 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "If consciousness is brain-produced, what happens at death?".
Afterlife
advanced

If consciousness is brain-produced, what happens at death?

Play scenario

Suppose the strict physicalist view is correct: consciousness is entirely produced by the brain, and when the brain stops, the conscious self ends.

Your call

How should you live, knowing that?

4 / 4 lenses
Play
Cinematic illustration for the thought experiment "If reincarnation is real, what should you optimise your life for?".
Afterlife
advanced

If reincarnation is real, what should you optimise your life for?

Play scenario

Suppose reincarnation is real: the same continuous self moves between lives, carrying forward something from each — habits, lessons, perhaps debts.

Your call

What should you optimise your current life for?

5 / 5 lenses
Play
Seed lenses · 9

Nine starter lenses, spanning ethics, science, spirit, and skepticism.

Each lens has an evidence-status label and a risk warning so Play cannot collapse into 'all worldviews are equal'.

ethical

Utilitarian lens

Philosophically serious

The right action is whichever produces the greatest overall wellbeing and least suffering.

Speculation
3
Usefulness
7
Harm risk
6
Assumptions
  • Wellbeing and suffering can be meaningfully compared across people.
  • Consequences are the primary moral fact.
  • Aggregating outcomes is a coherent moral procedure.
Explains well
  • Triage decisions under scarce resources.
  • Public-policy trade-offs across large populations.
  • Why preventing severe suffering usually outweighs minor inconvenience.
Struggles to explain
  • Why some violations of persons feel wrong even when outcomes are net-positive.
  • Rights, dignity, and promises that resist outcome-aggregation.
  • Cases where the calculus is impossible to actually run.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, utilitarian reasoning can justify treating individuals as means to a greater good and erodes moral intuitions about rights and dignity.

Related claimsfree-willcompatibilism
Worldview modelsstrict-physicalismskeptical-psychological-model
ethical

Deontological lens

Philosophically serious

Some actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of outcome — duties and rules come first.

Speculation
3
Usefulness
7
Harm risk
5
Assumptions
  • Persons have intrinsic moral worth that cannot be traded away.
  • Some duties (do not lie, do not kill the innocent) hold across cases.
  • Moral reasoning is rule-bound, not outcome-driven.
Explains well
  • Why honesty, promise-keeping, and consent matter even when violation would help.
  • Resistance to slippery-slope erosion of basic rights.
  • Strong intuitions against using a person purely as a tool.
Struggles to explain
  • Tragic dilemmas where every action breaks some duty.
  • How to weigh duties against each other when they conflict.
  • When rigid rule-following produces clearly worse outcomes.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, deontological reasoning becomes rule-worship and can produce serious harm in the name of obeying a principle.

Related claimsfree-willcompatibilism
Worldview modelsreligious-theismskeptical-psychological-model
ethical

Virtue ethics lens

Philosophically serious

The right action is whatever a person of good character would do — focus on becoming wise, courageous, just, and temperate.

Speculation
3
Usefulness
8
Harm risk
3
Assumptions
  • Character traits are real and can be trained over time.
  • There are traits broadly recognised across cultures as virtues.
  • Practical wisdom — knowing how to act in this case — is teachable.
Explains well
  • Why moral education and habit-formation matter.
  • Why good people sometimes do better than rule-followers in unfamiliar cases.
  • Why long-term character shapes short-term decisions.
Struggles to explain
  • Disagreement about which traits actually count as virtues.
  • How to act when no clear character template exists for a novel case.
  • How to evaluate a virtuous-seeming person whose actions cause harm.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, virtue ethics can become self-focused — optimising for being a good person rather than for actually doing good in the world.

Related claimslife-is-for-learningsuffering-produces-growthhigher-self
Worldview modelssoul-growth-modelreligious-theism
scientific

Physicalist lens

Evidence-backed

Everything that exists is physical or reducible to physical processes — including mind, meaning, and morality.

Speculation
4
Usefulness
7
Harm risk
4
Assumptions
  • Physical causation is the only real causation.
  • Mental states are ultimately brain states.
  • Apparent anomalies have ordinary physical explanations once investigated carefully.
Explains well
  • The reliability of physics, chemistry, and neuroscience.
  • Why most paranormal claims fail to replicate under controlled conditions.
  • How damage to the brain reliably alters mind.
Struggles to explain
  • The subjective character of conscious experience itself.
  • Carefully documented cases where ordinary explanations do not fit cleanly.
  • Why physicalism itself is true rather than an arbitrary stipulation.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, physicalism becomes pre-emptive dismissal — explaining away anomalies before they have been investigated, and treating subjective experience as if it does not exist.

Related claimsconsciousness-brain-productanoxia-explains-ndescryptomnesia-explains-past-livescold-reading-explains-mediumship
Worldview modelsstrict-physicalismskeptical-psychological-model
spiritual

Soul-growth lens

Plausible but speculative

Life is a curriculum — situations are arranged, partly or wholly, to develop the soul over time.

Speculation
8
Usefulness
7
Harm risk
6
Assumptions
  • There is a continuous self that persists across or beyond a single life.
  • Difficulty has formative purpose, not just causal accident.
  • Some intelligence — internal, external, or both — orders the curriculum.
Explains well
  • Why people often report meaningful growth from severe difficulty.
  • The psychological power of reframing painful events.
  • Why life-review experiences feel pedagogical rather than punitive.
Struggles to explain
  • Suffering with no apparent growth (early death, severe brain injury).
  • Why the curriculum looks identical to randomness from inside it.
  • How to test the model rather than only feel it.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, the soul-growth lens explains away injustice, blames victims for their circumstances, and discourages action against fixable harm.

Related claimslife-is-for-learningsuffering-produces-growtheverything-happens-for-reasonsouls-reincarnate-to-learnlife-review-realhigher-self
Worldview modelssoul-growth-modelconsciousness-continuity-modelreincarnation-model
spiritual

Karma lens

Weakly supported

Actions carry moral weight that returns to the actor, possibly across lives — a kind of cosmic moral accounting.

Speculation
9
Usefulness
5
Harm risk
8
Assumptions
  • Moral acts have non-physical causal consequences.
  • There is a mechanism — divine, structural, or otherwise — that tracks them.
  • Consequences can carry across lifetimes.
Explains well
  • Why most moral traditions converge on similar prohibitions.
  • The psychological observation that actions shape character which shapes life trajectory.
  • Why people seek meaning in apparent moral asymmetries.
Struggles to explain
  • Direct, falsifiable evidence of cross-life moral bookkeeping.
  • Visibly unjust outcomes for clearly virtuous people.
  • How the mechanism could plausibly operate without an enforcing agent.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, karma becomes victim-blaming — treating poverty, illness, or violence as deserved consequences of unseen past actions.

Related claimskarma-influences-reincarnationsouls-reincarnate-to-learneverything-happens-for-reason
Worldview modelsreincarnation-modelsoul-growth-modelreligious-theism
metaphysical

Determinist lens

Philosophically serious

Every event, including human choice, is fixed by the chain of prior causes — there is no genuinely open future.

Speculation
6
Usefulness
5
Harm risk
7
Assumptions
  • Causal closure of the physical world.
  • Apparent choice is the felt experience of an already-determined process.
  • The future is fixed in the same sense the past is.
Explains well
  • Why behaviour is highly predictable given enough information about a person's situation.
  • Why luck — birthplace, biology, era — explains so much of life outcomes.
  • Reduced moral grandstanding when others' behaviour is seen as caused.
Struggles to explain
  • The pervasive subjective sense of deliberation and choice.
  • Quantum-level indeterminacy in physics.
  • How moral responsibility survives in any meaningful form.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, determinism produces fatalism, erodes felt agency, and is sometimes used to excuse harmful behaviour as 'just what was going to happen'.

Related claimsdeterminismfree-willcompatibilismblock-universeeverything-happens-for-reason
Worldview modelsnonlinear-time-block-universestrict-physicalism
spiritual

Theist lens

Philosophically serious

Reality is grounded in a purposive divine intelligence; meaning, value, and moral order originate there.

Speculation
8
Usefulness
7
Harm risk
7
Assumptions
  • A conscious source of reality exists.
  • That source has intentions or values that bear on human life.
  • Meaning and morality are grounded outside the human mind.
Explains well
  • Why many people across cultures report a sense of being known or held.
  • The deep human intuition that goodness is real, not invented.
  • Why moral order feels foundational rather than arbitrary.
Struggles to explain
  • The problem of severe, undeserved suffering.
  • The diversity and incompatibility of religious revelations.
  • Why direct evidence of the divine remains contested.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, theism can authorise certainty about specific revelations, harden into in-group/out-group morality, and discourage honest engagement with contrary evidence.

Related claimstheismconscious-universenear-death-experienceslife-review-realhigher-self
Worldview modelsreligious-theismmind-first-realityconsciousness-continuity-model
skeptical

Nihilist lens

Useful but risky

There is no inherent meaning, purpose, or objective moral order — those are projections we add to a neutral universe.

Speculation
5
Usefulness
4
Harm risk
7
Assumptions
  • Meaning and value are not features of the universe.
  • Apparent moral facts are descriptions of human preferences.
  • Cosmic indifference is the default state of reality.
Explains well
  • Why the universe shows no apparent concern for human flourishing.
  • The historical and cultural variability of moral systems.
  • Why projecting cosmic meaning onto random events misleads us.
Struggles to explain
  • Why some moral intuitions appear stable across radically different cultures.
  • Why meaning, when constructed, still feels real and motivates action.
  • How to live well long-term under a strict no-meaning frame.
Risk if taken too far

Pushed too far, nihilism corrodes motivation, undercuts shared moral commitments, and is easily co-opted to justify harm under the slogan 'nothing matters'.

Related claimsconsciousness-brain-productdeterminismeverything-happens-for-reason
Worldview modelsstrict-physicalismskeptical-psychological-model
Roadmap

Where this lives in the plan

  1. V1
    Evidence Map + Best-Fit Worldview
    shipped
  2. V1.5
    Claim pages get a 'competing explanations' rail
    next
  3. V2
    Worldview Builder — user-tunable weights → personal model
    planned
  4. V3
    Play / Thought Experiments (this preview)
    scaffolded
  5. V4
    Users unlock lenses by exploring and build a worldview profile
    planned