Spiritual Evidence Map
← Sources
Secondary summarysecondarycontextVerified

Astrology and science

Wikipedia contributors · 2024 · Wikipedia

Spiritual Evidence Map/Last updated May 10, 2026/Claims v1.0.0-provisional/Sources v1.0.0/Scores provisional
Citation dossier

This source is used as context evidence across 2 linked claims and 3 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.

Source type
Secondary summary
Map role
context
Claim links
2
Direct access
Recorded

Summary

Survey of empirical tests of astrological claims, including the Carlson 1985 Nature double-blind test and the Dean & Mather review.

How this source is used on the map

The single best summary for why astrology, as a literal predictive system, fails controlled tests.

Citation record

Authors
Wikipedia contributors
Year
2024
Publication
Wikipedia
Source type
Secondary summary
Map role
context
Credibility level
secondary
Citation status
Verified
DOI
Not recorded
PubMed
Not recorded
PDF
Not recorded

Linked claims

Related evidence hubs

Related research reports

Related sources