Miracle
Wikipedia contributors · 2024 · Wikipedia
This source is used as context evidence across 1 linked claim and 3 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.
Summary
Cross-tradition overview of the concept of a miracle — divine intervention violating or suspending natural law — including Catholic canonisation criteria, Lourdes investigations, and the standard philosophical critiques.
How this source is used on the map
General reference for the miracles claim; pair with the SEP entry for the philosophical analysis.
Citation record
- Authors
- Wikipedia contributors
- Year
- 2024
- Publication
- Wikipedia
- Source type
- Secondary summary
- Map role
- context
- Credibility level
- secondary
- Citation status
- Verified
- DOI
- Not recorded
- PubMed
- Not recorded
- Not recorded
Linked claims
Related evidence hubs
Related sources
Academic frame for first-person mystical and psychedelic experience reports, especially when users ask whether an experience can justify a metaphysical belief.
Useful background for claims involving God, religious figures, or traditions because it clarifies what counts as a religious claim before evidence is weighed.
Default reference for the miracles claim's epistemic status; covers the Humean argument and the modern probabilistic responses.
Background context for distant intercessory prayer alongside the STEP and Cochrane references below.