Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer
Daryl J. Bem, Charles Honorton · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 4-18
This source is used as supports evidence across 2 linked claims and 2 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.
Summary
Classic Psychological Bulletin review arguing that the ganzfeld database had reached replication rates and effect sizes sufficient to warrant wider scientific attention.
How this source is used on the map
A central pro-psi anchor for ganzfeld/free-response claims, especially telepathy-style information transfer under sensory-reduction conditions.
Citation record
- Authors
- Daryl J. Bem, Charles Honorton
- Year
- 1994
- Publication
- Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 4-18
- Source type
- Meta-analysis
- Map role
- supports
- Credibility level
- primary
- Citation status
- Verified
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.4
- PubMed
- Not recorded
- Not recorded
Editorial note
Best read together with later skeptical reviews and meta-analyses; the result is important because it is contested, not because it closes the question.
Linked claims
Related evidence hubs
Related research reports
Related sources
One of the strongest pro-psi statistical summaries published in a mainstream APA journal.
Major reference for the sceptical / cognitive-explanation side of psi-style claims.
Pairs directly with the Storm et al. meta-analysis — the classic skeptical reply in the same journal issue.
The classic skeptical replication counterpoint to Bem and Honorton, useful for keeping ganzfeld pages from presenting a one-sided meta-analytic story.
Useful general-audience anchor for psi-related claims; gives both the field's self-description and the standard sceptical critique.