Spiritual Evidence Map
← Topics
pillar hub·12 claims·27 verified sources

Psi / psychic phenomena evidence.

Telepathy, precognition, remote viewing, PK. This hub collects the relevant claims, strongest and weakest evidence positions, source records, and map/library views for the cluster.

Spiritual Evidence Map/Last updated May 10, 2026/Claims v1.0.0-provisional/Sources v1.0.0/Scores provisional
Research

Related research reports

3
Claims

Strongest claims in this topic

6
Claims

Weakest or most speculative claims

4
Source layer

Key verified sources

27

Anomalous information reception by research mediums under blinded conditions II: Replication and extension

Julie Beischel, Mark Boccuzzi, et al. · 2015 · Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 11(2), 136-142
StudySupportsPrimaryVerified

Useful as a claimed replication/extension of the 2007 Windbridge-style protocol; still controversial, but much stronger than anecdotal stage mediumship.

Predictive physiological anticipation preceding seemingly unpredictable stimuli: a meta-analysis

Julia Mossbridge, Patrizio Tressoldi, Jessica Utts · 2012 · Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 390
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

The most-cited modern meta-analysis on presentiment; central to debate about whether physiology can show anticipatory responses to future stimuli.

Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect

Daryl J. Bem · 2011 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

The most-discussed modern empirical paper claiming evidence for precognition; directly triggered the Wagenmakers et al. critique and helped catalyse psychology's broader replication-crisis conversation.

Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992–2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology

Lance Storm, Patrizio E. Tressoldi, Lorenzo Di Risio · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 471–485
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

One of the strongest pro-psi statistical summaries published in a mainstream APA journal.

Anomalous information reception by research mediums demonstrated using a novel triple-blind protocol

Julie Beischel, Gary E. Schwartz · 2007 · Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 3(1), 23-27
StudySupportsPrimaryVerified

A core positive mediumship paper because it explicitly targets cold reading, sitter cueing, experimenter cueing, and fraud as alternative explanations.

Examining psychokinesis: The interaction of human intention with random number generators - A meta-analysis

Holger Bosch, Fiona Steinkamp, Emil Boller · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 497-523
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

The key modern meta-analytic source for micro-PK claims: important because it reports a signal but also makes the interpretive weakness visible.

An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning

Jessica Utts · 1995 · American Institutes for Research / CIA Stargate archive
ReviewSupportsPrimaryVerified

Core pro-remote-viewing evaluation from the Stargate review period; should be paired with Hyman's evaluation to show the interpretive split.

Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer

Daryl J. Bem, Charles Honorton · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 4-18
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

A central pro-psi anchor for ganzfeld/free-response claims, especially telepathy-style information transfer under sensory-reduction conditions.

Phantasms of the Living

Edmund Gurney, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore · 1886 · Trübner and Co. for the Society for Psychical Research, London
BookSupportsPrimaryVerified

The canonical historical case base for spontaneous precognition and related psi-style experiences; cited across the field as the starting point for spontaneous-case methodology.

A Bayesian analysis reveals evidence against micro-psychokinesis

Markus A. Maier, Moritz Dechamps, et al. · 2018 · Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 379
StudyChallengesPrimaryVerified

Useful modern counterweight to earlier RNG meta-analyses because it focuses on evidential strength rather than only significance testing.