Spiritual Evidence Map
← Topics
category hub·9 claims·19 verified sources

Psi & Anomalous evidence.

Lab-tested claims of telepathy, precognition, remote viewing, and PK. This hub collects the relevant claims, strongest and weakest evidence positions, source records, and map/library views for the cluster.

Spiritual Evidence Map/Last updated May 10, 2026/Claims v1.0.0-provisional/Sources v1.0.0/Scores provisional
Authority guide

What Psi evidence actually supports

Psi is strongest when treated as a contested anomaly literature rather than as proof of consumer psychic powers. The best pages compare small statistical effects, spontaneous reports, and methodological objections in one place.

Strongest evidence
  • Ganzfeld and free-response studies provide the most developed lab tradition for telepathy-style information transfer.
  • Precognition and presentiment claims have modern experimental and meta-analytic sources, especially Bem-style and Mossbridge-style work.
  • Remote-viewing evidence is most useful where it uses formal protocols, independent judging, and the Stargate-era Utts/Hyman evaluation split.
  • Micro-PK research on random-number generators has meta-analytic evidence for tiny effects, but practical meaning is highly contested.
Strongest objections
  • Effect sizes are usually small and replication is uneven.
  • Sensory leakage, file-drawer effects, optional stopping, multiple comparisons, and flexible analysis remain serious concerns.
  • Macro-PK claims such as levitation or object movement have not survived the same level of scrutiny.
  • Commercial psychic claims often overstate a literature that, at best, supports weak and contested anomalies.
What this does not prove

Psi evidence does not prove reliable psychic powers, a known mechanism, spirit communication, or practical forecasting ability. It does support careful study of a small set of contested anomaly claims.

Research

Related research reports

2
Claims

Strongest claims in this topic

6
Claims

Weakest or most speculative claims

4
Source layer

Key verified sources

19

Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer

Daryl J. Bem, Charles Honorton · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 4-18
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

A central pro-psi anchor for ganzfeld/free-response claims, especially telepathy-style information transfer under sensory-reduction conditions.

Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer

Julie Milton, Richard Wiseman · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 387-391
Meta-analysisChallengesPrimaryVerified

The classic skeptical replication counterpoint to Bem and Honorton, useful for keeping ganzfeld pages from presenting a one-sided meta-analytic story.

Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992–2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology

Lance Storm, Patrizio E. Tressoldi, Lorenzo Di Risio · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 471–485
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

One of the strongest pro-psi statistical summaries published in a mainstream APA journal.

Meta-analysis that conceals more than it reveals: Comment on Storm et al. (2010)

Ray Hyman · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 486–490
Skeptical analysisChallengesPrimaryVerified

Pairs directly with the Storm et al. meta-analysis — the classic skeptical reply in the same journal issue.

An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning

Jessica Utts · 1995 · American Institutes for Research / CIA Stargate archive
ReviewSupportsPrimaryVerified

Core pro-remote-viewing evaluation from the Stargate review period; should be paired with Hyman's evaluation to show the interpretive split.

Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011)

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels, et al. · 2011 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432
Skeptical analysisChallengesPrimaryVerified

Foundational sceptical reply — also helped trigger the broader replication-crisis conversation in psychology.

Predictive physiological anticipation preceding seemingly unpredictable stimuli: a meta-analysis

Julia Mossbridge, Patrizio Tressoldi, Jessica Utts · 2012 · Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 390
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

The most-cited modern meta-analysis on presentiment; central to debate about whether physiology can show anticipatory responses to future stimuli.

Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect

Daryl J. Bem · 2011 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

The most-discussed modern empirical paper claiming evidence for precognition; directly triggered the Wagenmakers et al. critique and helped catalyse psychology's broader replication-crisis conversation.

Examining psychokinesis: The interaction of human intention with random number generators - A meta-analysis

Holger Bosch, Fiona Steinkamp, Emil Boller · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 497-523
Meta-analysisSupportsPrimaryVerified

The key modern meta-analytic source for micro-PK claims: important because it reports a signal but also makes the interpretive weakness visible.

Phantasms of the Living

Edmund Gurney, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore · 1886 · Trübner and Co. for the Society for Psychical Research, London
BookSupportsPrimaryVerified

The canonical historical case base for spontaneous precognition and related psi-style experiences; cited across the field as the starting point for spontaneous-case methodology.