Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer
Julie Milton, Richard Wiseman · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 387-391
This source is used as challenges evidence across 2 linked claims and 2 related evidence hubs. Its citation record is marked verified; that verifies the source trail, not the truth of any linked claim.
Summary
Meta-analysis of post-Bem/Honorton ganzfeld studies reporting failure to replicate the claimed information-transfer effect under comparable conditions.
How this source is used on the map
The classic skeptical replication counterpoint to Bem and Honorton, useful for keeping ganzfeld pages from presenting a one-sided meta-analytic story.
Citation record
- Authors
- Julie Milton, Richard Wiseman
- Year
- 1999
- Publication
- Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 387-391
- Source type
- Meta-analysis
- Map role
- challenges
- Credibility level
- primary
- Citation status
- Verified
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.387
- PubMed
- Recorded
- Not recorded
Linked claims
Related evidence hubs
Related research reports
Related sources
Major reference for the sceptical / cognitive-explanation side of psi-style claims.
Pairs directly with the Storm et al. meta-analysis — the classic skeptical reply in the same journal issue.
One of the strongest pro-psi statistical summaries published in a mainstream APA journal.
A central pro-psi anchor for ganzfeld/free-response claims, especially telepathy-style information transfer under sensory-reduction conditions.
Useful general-audience anchor for psi-related claims; gives both the field's self-description and the standard sceptical critique.