Spiritual Evidence Map
← Topics
pillar hub·10 claims·26 verified sources

Physics-adjacent worldview theories evidence.

Many-worlds, simulation, mathematical universe. This hub collects the relevant claims, strongest and weakest evidence positions, source records, and map/library views for the cluster.

Spiritual Evidence Map/Last updated May 10, 2026/Claims v1.0.0-provisional/Sources v1.0.0/Scores provisional
Claims

Strongest claims in this topic

6
Claims

Weakest or most speculative claims

4
Source layer

Key verified sources

26

Is our universe likely to decay within 20 billion years?

Don N. Page · 2008 · Physical Review D, 78(6), 063535
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

The clearest statement of how the Boltzmann-brain count is tamed by a finite vacuum lifetime; companion paper to 'Return of the Boltzmann brains'.

Sinks in the Landscape, Boltzmann Brains, and the Cosmological Constant Problem

Andrei Linde · 2007 · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2007(01), 022
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

Sets up one of the main physical pathways for resolving the paradox — vacuum decay into terminal states before BBs can dominate.

Can the universe afford inflation?

Andreas Albrecht, Lorenzo Sorbo · 2004 · Physical Review D, 70(6), 063528
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

One of the canonical modern statements of the Boltzmann-brain comparison and its implications for inflation.

Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant

Lisa Dyson, Matthew Kleban, Leonard Susskind · 2002 · Journal of High Energy Physics, 2002(10), 011
Journal articleSupportsPrimaryVerified

The paper that reignited modern interest in the Boltzmann-brain problem by linking it directly to the accelerating expansion of our universe.

Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad

Sean M. Carroll · 2017 · arXiv:1702.00850 (Caltech preprint; later in 'Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science')
Journal articleChallengesPrimaryVerified

The standard reference for the cognitive-instability resolution and the philosophical case against taking Boltzmann-brain dominance as a real prediction.

Why Boltzmann Brains Don't Fluctuate Into Existence From the De Sitter Vacuum

Kimberly K. Boddy, Sean M. Carroll, Jason Pollack · 2016 · The Philosophy of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, ch. 11
Book chapterChallengesPrimaryVerified

Major physical objection to Boltzmann-brain dominance: the static de Sitter vacuum is sterile, so the mathematical fluctuation probability does not translate into real observers.

The Unreality of Time

J. Ellis McTaggart · 1908 · Mind, 17(68), 457-474
Journal articleChallengesPrimaryVerified

Gives the time-exists page a canonical anti-realist anchor rather than treating the question as only a physics issue.

Simon Friederich · 2024 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

Frames the anthropic / multiverse / design debate that simulation, mathematical-universe, and theism claims all engage with.

William Mander · 2024 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

Reference for claims that the universe itself is divine or conscious; it helps keep poetic, religious, and metaphysical versions of the claim distinct.

Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Jeffrey Barrett · 2023 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy referenceContextPrimaryVerified

Steel-manned reference for what the many-worlds interpretation actually says, useful because popular versions often overstate what the physics entails.